An introduction to the argument in favor of capital punishment in the united states

The existence of capital punishment and the threat that is it is a possibility is enough to deter crime and as a result, this practice should be continued.

An introduction to the argument in favor of capital punishment in the united states

Inthe United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which is a pledge among nations to promote fundamental rights as the foundation of freedom, justice, and peace in the world.

The political elite in Europe often condemn the US as human rights violators since we still use the death penalty on murderers, which they insist is a violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

And they also point to Article 5, which states that no one shall be subjected to cruel or degrading punishment. From this, abolitinists self-righteously declare that the death penalty violates both of these rights. But in fact, nowhere in that declaration is the DP specifically condemned as a human rights violation!

For instance, in Article 3 it states: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. But if we were to follow that reasoning, we would have to abolish prisons as a human rights violation as well since they deprive people of liberty.

So the interpretation that abolitionists derive from Article 3 of the Declaration is illogical and contradictory. And in Article 5, it states: No one shall be subjected to cruel or degrading punishment.

From this, abolitionists insist that capital punishment is ruled out because it is "the ultimate cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment. Indeed, what is stated in Article 5 is highly subjective and open to interpretation and could just as easily be applied to prisons as well.

And at the time it was implemented, most nations who signed it had the had the death penalty and continued to use it long after the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was approved by them. So obviously, the signers back then had the moral coherence to appreciate the distinction between murders and executions.

What the DP is, is a punishment for a human rights violation, not a human rights violation itself. Anyone with any amount of moral judgment and coherence would recognize and respect that difference.

All abolitionists are trying to do is protect human rights violators at the expense of their victims by trying to pass off the just punishment of human rights violations as a human rights violation itself, an analysis that one would have to be totally lacking in sound moral judgement to accept since it is so obviously contradictory as well as morally and logically skewed.

European elites enjoy showcasing their opposition to the death penalty as a progressive policy based on the respect of human rights.

Death Penalty Persuasive Essay

Such large contradictions usually suggest there are other motives. Germany, along with France, has long led the anti-death penalty charge in Europe.

The mayor of Paris took this viewpoint to such an extreme position that he named a city street after convicted American cop killer Mumia Abu-Jamal.

Instead, it was based on protecting convicted Nazi war criminals: Communist East Germany kept the death penalty until But the actual history of the German death penalty ban casts this claim in a different light.

Helping students improve writing skills since 2000!

Article was in fact the brainchild of a right-wing politician who sympathized with convicted Nazi war criminals -- and sought to prevent their execution by British and American occupation authorities. According to Interpol and the FBI this is not necessarily the case.

If one excludes murders committed by inner city blacks from the statistics the United States actually has a lower murder rate then Germany and France. That is not to imply that blacks are inherently evil.

Their murder rates have more to do with welfare policies, racial separatism, etc. Most blacks are decent people, but a sizeable minority of them commits a disproportionate amount of crimes. Casting this high murder rate over all sections of American society is irrational at best. It makes sense to exclude black murders to even things out because France, Germany, and the UK do not have a minority that commits 7 times per capita more murders then the rest of the country.

Otherwise, we are comparing apples to oranges. This on top of the fact that we include deaths caused by self-defense in the murder statistics. Failing to take such differences in demographics between America and Europe into account mislead people into believing that a high murder rate that is committed by a single ethnic group prevails over all parts of American society, and that is simply not the case.

Indeed, in much of the developed world. Crime has recently hit record highs in Paris, Madrid, Stockholm, Amsterdam, Toronto, and a host of other major cities.

An introduction to the argument in favor of capital punishment in the united states

In a study, the British Home Office the equivalent of the U. Department of Justice found violent and property crime increased in the late s in every wealthy country except the United States. American property crime rates have been lower than those in Britain, Canada, and France since the early s, and violent crime rates throughout the E.

Even Sweden, once the epitome of cosmopolitan socialist prosperity, now has a crime victimization rate 20 percent higher than the United States. Americans, on the other hand, have become much safer.United States History I.

Introduction United States History, story of how the republic developed from colonial beginnings in the 16th century, when the first European explorers arrived, until modern times.

Capital punishment debate in the United States existed as early as the colonial period. As of it remains a legal penalty in 31 states, the federal government, and military criminal justice systems. The Death Penalty and Reform in the United States. Robin M.

An introduction to the argument in favor of capital punishment in the united states

Maher* Use of the death penalty in the United States has always been controversial. In , the United States reinstated the death penalty after having revoked it in on the grounds that it "violated the Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishment" (MacKinnon, "Ethics" ).

Since its reinstatement, the morality of such punishment has been extensively debated. I feel that it is important to print an article in opposition to capital punishment. The death penalty has always been one of the most hotly debated issues in the United States. As our country grows older and wiser, however, evidence clearly points to the fact that the death penalty is not a good solution.

Who Owns Death? Capital Punishment, the American Conscience, and the End of Executions [Robert J. Lifton, Greg Mitchell] on caninariojana.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.

In this timely book, Robert Jay Lifton and Greg Mitchell investigate the mindsets of individuals involved in the death penalty -- including prison wardens.

Article I - The United States Constitution